Legal Opinion

Patel v. Parnes

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 19, 2008No. CV 07-05364 MMM (SHx)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; GRANTING DEPENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

This is a securities class action against defendants Andrew H. Parnés and Stephen J. Scarborough, two executives of Standard Pacific Corporation. Lead plaintiffs Pinellas Park Retirement System (General Employees), Plumbers Local No. 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund, and City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System seek to represent all persons who purchased the publicly traded securities of Standard Pacific between October 27, 2005 and August 2, 2007 (the…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. In re American Apparel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Stevens v. InPhonic, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. IxiaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API