Cherry's Incorporated v. Sharpensteen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
— Cherry’s Incorporated brought this action of replevin against defendant, Sharpensteen, to recover the possession or value of a Hudson automobile. It appears that at Los Angeles, California, on October 6th, 1925, one Rose Moore bought the automobile from the J. K. Fonk Finance Company, on a contract conditioned that the title should remain in the seller until the purchase price of $990 was fully paid, such sum to be paid in monthly installments extending over a considerable period of time. On the same date the seller sold, assigned and transferred all its right, title and interest in and to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Felt v. FeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Nettles v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Greer v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Cache Auto Co. v. Central GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Bradshaw v. Kleiber Motor Truck Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bayham v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Bank of America v. J & S Auto RepairsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- C.I.T. Corporation v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932