Legal Opinion

Cache Auto Co. v. Central Garage

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1923No. 3993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

On July 20, 1921, plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendants, other than Central Garage Company, a certain automobile for the sum of $300, payable at a later date and retained title within itself as security for the purchase price. The title retaining agreement provided that in default of payment of the sums therein mentioned plaintiff might retake possession of the car. On December 7, 1921, the defendant Carlisle, one of the purchasers, took the ear to the defendant Central Garage Company for repairs with instructions to put the machine in thorough repair, which was afterwards done in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Reeves & Co. v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. J. A. Broom & Son v. S. S. Dale & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Drummond Carriage Co. v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. City Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Champa v. Consolidated Finance Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sundin v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SpoffordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API