Legal Opinion

White Sewing Machine Co. v. Betting

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1893Published

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — -Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— The plaintiff recovered judgment for possession, and the defendant appeals. The controversy between the parties is touching one number 3 White Sewing Machine, which the plaintiff took from the defendant’s possession upon a writ of replevin issued by a justice of the peace. The parties are the same as in the case which was heretofore before us (46 Mo. App. 417), and the evidence adduced in support ■of the plaintiff’s case is substantially the same as in the former action. The difference between the two cases is that this is an action of replevin for one machine, while the former action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Mandel v. Peet, Simms & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  4. Fremont Cultivator Co. v. FultonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Irwin v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API