Fremont Cultivator Co. v. Fulton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellant brought this action upon three promissory notes executed to it by appellees, one of which was due, and two of which were not due. At the same time the complaint was filed, two affidavits were filed. One, in the form of an affidavit in attachment, seems to have been upon the same paper with the complaint. In relation to the other, the record as made by the clerk states: “ Said plaintiff *394also filed the following affidavit in attachment and garnishment.” The statements in the bill of exceptions filed below and copied into and made a part of the record here, in relation to this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Dunn v. CrockerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Mandel v. Peet, Simms & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
- Cox v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stewart v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- United States Capsule Co. v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Redman v. BurgessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. BettingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893