Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1985No. E002195PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
—Petitioner (sometimes herein called applicant) seeks review of an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB or Board) denying his petition for reconsideration of an order by a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) which determined petitioner had not proved his injury arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment and that therefore he was not entitled to benefits.
This court initially denied the petition for writ of review on the ground the petition was not timely filed. However, the California Supreme Court granted review and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Southwest Airlines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Toyota of Pensacola v. MainesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Malloy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.