Legal Opinion
Malloy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 24, 1991No. C011821PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Petitioner (applicant) seeks review of an opinion and order of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), We shall hold that a petition for writ of review filed more than 45 days after the Board’s denial of reconsideration is jurisdictionally untimely. Accordingly, we shall dismiss the instant petition.
Labor Code section 5950 provides in pertinent part, “The application for writ of review must be made within 45 days after a petition for reconsideration is denied, or, if a petition is granted or reconsideration is had on the appeal board’s own motion, within 45…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Thaxter v. FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mario Saikhon, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Nasir v. Sacramento County Office of District AttorneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Paneno v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.