Legal Opinion

Toyota of Pensacola v. Maines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 1990No. 89-544PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

558 So.2d 1072 (1990)

TOYOTA OF PENSACOLA and Adjustco, Inc., Appellants,

v.

Buck E. MAINES, Appellee.

No. 89-544.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1990.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1990.

Roderic G. Magie, of Karl, McConnaughhay, Roland & Maida, P.A., Pensacola, for appellants.

Thomas F. Condon, of Mitchell & Condon, P.A., Pensacola, for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

In this workers' compensation appeal, Toyota and Adjustco, Inc., the employer/carrier (E/C), contest an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), which determined that claimant's injury was compensable on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Doctor's Business Service, Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Claim of Watson v. American Can Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Petroske v. Worth Ave. Burger PlaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Claim of Watson v. American Can Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Bayfront Medical Center v. HardingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Kramer v. Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Kash-N-Karry v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API