Legal Opinion

United States v. Steinberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1932No. 185PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The only point of consequence is whether section 215 of the Criminal. Code (18 US CA § 338) covers the ease of a letter posted by the accused in Canada, and received by the addressee in the United States. We regard this as concluded by Salinger v. Loisel, 265 U. S. 224, 44 S. Ct. 519, 68 L. Ed. 989, where it was held that the accused might be in-dieted and tried at the place where the let; ter was received. The amendment of 1909 (35 Stat. 1130 [18 USCA § 338]) created another crime; that of causing a letter to be delivered to a person within the United States by means of its mails. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Lamar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Cyril Charron v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Kaufman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. ArcherDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API