Klump v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
In this case, Luther W. Klump (Mr. Klump or plaintiff), a veteran cattle rancher in southeastern Arizona, alleges that valuable water rights were taken from him by the United States in violation of the Fifth Amendment, thereby requiring just compensation. Defendant argues that there was no such taking because it acquired the water rights not through the exercise of any sovereign power, but under the normal processes of state law. After careful consideration of the briefs filed by the parties, as well as the extensive oral argument conducted herein, the court concludes…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meryl Squires-Cannon v. Forest Preserve District of CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Mohlen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Klump v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Klump v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.