Legal Opinion

Klump v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 16, 2002No. 94-309CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*169OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

“Two wrongs do not make a right. Two wrongs simply make two wrongs.”1

This case is before the court following trial in Tucson, Arizona. Plaintiffs cattle were grazing illegally on Federal land without a permit. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) eventually impounded the cattle and sold them at auction. Under the BLM regulations, plaintiff is owed the difference between the auction price for the cattle and the costs associated with the impoundment and sale thereof. Plaintiff, however, asserts that the costs billed by the BLM against the sale proceeds were grossly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Sensonics, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Aerosonic Corp., and Herbert J. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Public Lands Council v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Minnick v. California Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniel Gabino Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API