Legal Opinion
O'DONNELL v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1937No. Civ. 5885PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A complaint was filed against petitioner herein before the Board of Medical Examiners, wherein he was charged with unprofessional conduct as the same is defined under the terms of the first subdivision of section 14 of the Medical Practice Act, Deering’s General Laws, 1931, Act 4807.
After a hearing the board revoked appellant’s license to practice medicine. From such order of revocation a petition for writ of review was filed in the superior court, the writ was issued, and after a hearing a judgment was rendered affirming the decision of the Board of Medical Examiners. From that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schneider v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- MacCracken v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sparks v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938