Legal Opinion

Cornia v. Putnam

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1971No. 12383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff, alleging ownership of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 22, T. 9 North, R. 6 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, initiated this action to compel defendant to remove a fence which he had erected allegedly upon plaintiff’s land. Defendant responded by answer and counterclaim, asserting his ownership in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 22 and contending that the controversy involved the location of the boundary line between the two parcels. Defendant prayed that the true and correct boundary line be decreed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Webb v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Henrie v. HyerUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Marsh v. IrvineUtah Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Colman v. ButkovichUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cornia v. PutnamUtah Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API