Legal Opinion

Kidder v. Pueschner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plaintiffs claim title under a deed executed in 1904 from the Keshena Improvement Company of government lot 2, section 28, township 37 north, of range 12 east, and other lands. Lot 2 borders on Pine Lake and is in the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the said section. In 1894 the Keshena Improvement Company executed a deed to R. S. Coffin describing by metes and bounds a tract of land bordering on the lake recited as containing ten acres, more or less, which included the part of lot 2 lying on the west shore of the lake. The description of this deed is definite and certain.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Oconto Co. v. JerrardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Fallass v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Schwallback v. Chicago, Milwaueee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Watson v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kordecki v. RizzoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Brody v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. IFC Collateral Corp. v. Commercial Units, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Saletri v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API