Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Horton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Polk county—Judge John K. Davis. June 8, 1917’.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwokth, J.
1. When considered in connection with the pleadings and the evidence, and in the light of the entire chax-ge of the court, no error that would warrant the granting of a new. trial was committed in any of the following excerpts,.from the charge:
(а) “You should first determine the question of .whether or not the defendant is liable in the case. In order for it to be liable in the case ydu would have to find that, it was guilty of negligence in at least one of the ways set out in the petition, and that such negligence caused or contributed to the injury of the plaintiff.” Civil Code (1910), §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Americus, Preston & Lumpkin Railroad v. LuckieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. SkipperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Southern Cotton-Oil Co. v. GladmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Betts Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owensby v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HilderbrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Middlebrooks v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Moody v. HardemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932