Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Hilderbrand
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. Where a petition against a master alleges that the plaintiff, a servant, was injured while walking on a platform at the freight depot of the master, a railroad company, the same being the place at which the plaintiff was performing his work, by reason of a bolt negligently placed on the platform by a fellow servant, the presence of which was known to the defendant, or by the exercise of ordinary care should have been known, and that the plaintiff did not know of the presence of such bolt on the platform and could not have known thereof by the exercise of ordinary care, in that such bolt…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Rountree v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- King Manufacturing Co. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HetzelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark v. Carla Gay Dress Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- White v. Cudahy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Church v. SMS ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Dessau v. AchordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Powell v. ShurlingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.