Legal Opinion

Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Skipper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1906PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Burch. City court of Dublin. February 13, 1905. Skipper brought an action against the Southern Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for a personal injury. A verdict for $2,500 was rendered iii his favor. The defendant moved for a new trial, which was refused, and it excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In one respect this ease brings to mind the words of Juvenal: “Bara avis in terris, nigroque simillima cygno.” Its quality of rarity consists in the fact that counsel for both sides concur in the opinion that the trial judge erred in giving to the-jury a particular charge, and that a new trial should be granted. In this unusually harmonious view *371we concur with them. Thus is furnished the spectacle (more rare indeed than a black swan) of a court of last resort being able to render'a judgment which, as to one point at least, meets the concurrent views of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. BurneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Hill v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Pierce v. Atlanta Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Hunt v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API