Moody v. Hardeman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. The rule that the master is not liable for his failure to furnish his servants a safe place in which to work “where the very work the servants are employed, to do consists in making a dangerous place safe, or in constantly changing the character of the place for safety as the work progresses” (Holland v. Durham Coal Co., 131 Ga. 715, 63 S. E. 290; Byrd v. Thompson, 146 Ga. 300, 91 S. E. 100), will not relieve the master from liability “merely because the servant was engaged in construction work, and . . at the time of the injury the object being constructed was in an unfinished state, to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Holland v. Durham Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Rountree v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Williams v. Garbutt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Owensby v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HilderbrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Rogers v. BraggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968