Legal Opinion
Norton v. Miller
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 11, 1946No. Docket 147/63PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The decision of this cause centers in the solution of a sharp and critical question of fact.
The transaction from which the present litigation is derived was instituted by an agreement dated September 5th, 1945, in which the defendants promised to convey and the complainant contracted to purchase on December 1st, 1945, for the price of $8,850 certain premises situate in the Borough of Surf City. The agreement embraces a stipulation that the time designated for the consummation of the sale "is of the essence" of the bargain. The settlement was not accomplished on December 1st, 1945.
It must be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doctorman v. SchroederSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Strauss v. RabeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Kerney v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Bommelyn v. MossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Collins v. Delaney Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. PerkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Cline v. KurzweilNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Diamonde v. Berkeley TownshipNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Hodes v. DunskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.