Schwiesau v. Mahon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Acting Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
By this action it was sought to foreclose the lien of a street assessment. The court held that there was no valid contract for the work, and therefore no lien.
Defendant put in evidence, at the trial, the contract entered into by the plaintiff. By it plaintiff agreed to do all the work necessary to be done to grade Fifth street in the town of San Rafael, and to construct curbing and rock gutterways along both sides of said Fifth street, between certain points named, “All in strict accordance with the specifications hereto annexed and made a part of this contract, and also that he will furnish,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Chambers v. SatterleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanders v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bower v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Gill v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.