Legal Opinion

Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1956No. 7075_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

230 F.2d 855

108 U.S.P.Q. 383

COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Stalfort Pressure-Pak

Corporation, John C. Stalfort & Sons, Inc., and

Read Drug & Chemical Company, Inc., Appellants,

v.

CARTER PRODUCTS, Inc., Joseph G. Spitzer and Marvin Small, Appellees.

No. 7075.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 11, 1955.

Decided March 8, 1956.

John T. Cahill, New York City (Benjamin B. Schneider, New York City, H. Vernon Eney, Baltimore, Md., H. Walter Reynolds, New York City, Trenton Meredith, Jersey City, N.J., Thomas C. Mason, New York City, H. Paul Rome, H. Ross Black, Jr., and Venable, Baetjer…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  2. Vogue Instrument Corp. v. Lem Instruments Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Cleary v. BolgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API