Cleary v. Bolger

I concur in the result. I cannot, however, join the Court’s opinion, because I do not find it necessary in the present circumstances to pass upon the question whether Rea v. United States, 350 U. S. 214, may ever support an injunction against a state official who has received evidence illegally obtained by federal officers even though “there is no evidence of a purpose to avoid federal re*402quirements and the information has not been acquired by the state official in violation of a federal court order.” For me consideration of that question is obviated by the commendably broad reading which the…