Legal Opinion
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 12, 2002No. SLIP OP. 02-112; Court 01-00236PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Allegheny Ludlum Corp., AK Steel Corp., Butler Armeo Independent Union, J & L Specialty Steel, Inc., North American Stainless, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, and Zanes-ville Armeo Independent Organization (“the domestic industry”), contest the final results in Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Taiwan: Final Rescission of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Review, 66 Fed.Reg. 18,610 (Apr. 10, 2001) (“Final Rescission”), by the U.S. Department of Commerce (the “Department,” “Commerce” or “Government”). The domestic industry asks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Fujian MacHinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Domtar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025