Legal Opinion
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 24, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-89; Court 02-00502PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion for judgment on the administrative record filed by Plaintiffs, Allegheny Lud-lum Corporation, AK Steel Corporation, Butler Armco Independent Union, J & L Specialty Steel, Inc., United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC, and Zanes-ville Armco Independent Organization (“Plaintiffs”), domestic producers of stainless steel plate coils or unions representing workers who produce stainless steel plate coils. Plaintiffs challenge the final results by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in Stainless Steel…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Washington Int'l Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009