Legal Opinion
Abarca v. Franklin County Water District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2011No. 2:07-mj-00388PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: BAC DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DAUBERT MOTIONS
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
This lawsuit arises out of a now-closed cooling tower manufacturing facility (the “BAC site”) that pressure treated wood and was operated by entities formerly owned by the BAC Defendants (“BAC”). 1 Plaintiffs, current or former residents of residential neighborhoods (“Beachwood”) near the BAC Site, 2 allege that two contaminants from the BAC Site migrated from the treating area via groundwater, surface water, surface soil, private well, and air…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tyree v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Eghnayem v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Abarca v. FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.