Abarca v. FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: BAC DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL. (PHASE 1)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Merck & Co., Inc. Amsted Industries Inc., and Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. (collectively, “BAC Defendants”) bring this motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”), or in the alternative, motion for new trial following jury verdicts in the first phase (“Phase 1”) of this multi-party, multi-phase toxic tort case.
According to Defendants, Plaintiffs either failed to present or presented insufficient…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.