People v. Peet
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
less driving. The only witness for the People was an officer who testified that while patrolling a boulevard in the county he noticed the defendant driving between forty-five and fifty miles per hour down the boulevard, by other automobiles and across street intersections. We are not impressed by the strength of the evidence in the case, but find it sufficient to uphold the judgment. The only question in the case arises out of rulings on the evidence.
The defendant by way of cross-examination asked the officer the following questions: “Por what .purpose were you patrolling the highway?” “Were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Boyd v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Barnett v. HentgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. HardacreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004