Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This action was commenced in the court of a justice of the peace to recover damages consequent upon the alleged nonperformance of an agreement.
It was alleged in the complaint that, in consideration *135of one hundred dollars, the defendant agreed “ to locate the plaintiff on certain vacant government land in the county of San Benito, state of California; but this plaintiff avers that said defendant failed to carry out and fulfill said contract and agreement, in that they (it) failed and neglected to locate this plaintiff on said or any lands pursuant to their said contract.”
A copy of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Schroeder v. WittramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Copertini v. OppermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by24 opinions
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kelliher v. KelliherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Oregon Short Line R. v. District Court of Third Judicial DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.