Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (“Tennessee”) filed a tariff revision with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) in 1996. The company sought to change the method it uses to allocate requests for available capacity on its natural gas pipeline, switching from “first come-first served” to “net present value,” or “NPV.” Over objections, FERC ultimately approved a twenty-year cap on bids evaluated under NPV. It also approved the use of NPV to evaluate requests from shippers to change the primary points…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Tejas Power Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Nos. 89-1267Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Municipal Defense Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Myersville Citizens for a Rural Community, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- American Gas Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Amer Gas Assn v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Village of Bethany, Illinois, and Amoco Production Co., Intervenors-Petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Of America, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002