Legal Opinion
Tejas Power Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Nos. 89-1267
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 24, 1990No. 998PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Over the past decade, the Federal Energy Regulatory .Commission has taken a number of steps to make the market for the sale of natural gas more competitive. One such step has been to encourage pipeline companies to implement a gas inventory charge (GIC). As the Commission explained in a statement of policy made in the course of Order No. 500, Regulation■ of Natural Gas Pipelines After Partial Wellhead Decontrol, 52 Fed.Reg. 30,334 (1987), record remanded on other grounds, American Gas Ass’n v. FERC, 888…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- California ex rel. Lockyer v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sithe/Independence Power Partners, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Grand Council of the Crees v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.