Richards v. Blaisdell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court'.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action on a claim reduced to judgment against an executor in the probate court in Minnesota, the testator’s domicile, and rejected by the ancillary administrator with the will annexed in this state.
Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendants and interveners appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
William K. Blaisdell died testate in the state of Minnesota, being a resident of that state at the time of his death. He left estate in Minnesota and also in California, that in the latter state consisting of real property only. Letters testamentary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Johnson v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hopper v. . HopperNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Huneke v. HunekeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Reina v. ErassarretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hare v. ReilyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Reily v. HareTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.