Legal Opinion
Reily v. Hare
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1926No. 760-4358PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
This is a suit by F. H. Reily, plaintiff in error, against Silas Hare, administrator of the estate of Samuel Bailey, deceased, originating in the district court' of Grayson county. In his petition upon which trial was had, he alleged that Silas Hare is the legally appointed, qualified, and acting administrator of the estate of Samuel Bailey, who died September 24, 1912, in Pottawatomie county, state of Oklahoma; that at the time of Bailey’s death he had a small amount of property in the state of Oklahoma, and approximately $55,000 in cash on time deposit in the State National- Bank in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stacy v. Thrasher Ex Rel. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Johnson v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Barnard's Heirs v. ASHLEY'S HEIRSSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- William J. McLean v. James L. MeekSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Hill v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fenley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Dyer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Central Motor Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Nava v. Nationwide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.