Legal Opinion
Hare v. Reily
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 10, 1925No. 9178. [fn*]PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.
F. H. Reily, an attorney of Pottawatomie county, Okl., brought this suit against Silas Hare as administrator of the estate of Samuel W. Bailey, to recover an amount alleged to be due him as attorney’s fee for services rendered B. F. Hamilton, executor of the same estate in Oklahoma. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for the sum of $6,000 and costs, from which appellant has properly perfected appeal and assigned errors. The pleadings are voluminous but the case may be narrowed to the following, statement:
On September 24, 1912, Samuel W. Bailey, of Pottawatomie county, Okl., died,. leaving a…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Hampton v. M'connelSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fenley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Dyer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Reily v. HareTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Central Motor Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.