Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Strange

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1891No. 267PublishedCited by 107 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF' THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. In 1857, William Newton Morcer uJnveyed certain lands in Illinois to Ayres P. Merrill, in trust for the latter’s daughter, Anna M., to the sole and separate use of -said Anna M., and the heirs of her body, free from the control, debts, liabilities or contracts of any husband she might have, with power in the trustee to sell and dispose of the same, in whole or in part, and reinvest the proceeds in either real or personal…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF' THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. In 1857, William Newton Morcer uJnveyed certain lands in Illinois to Ayres P. Merrill, in trust for the latter’s daughter, Anna M., to the sole and separate use of -said Anna M., and the heirs of her body, free from the control, debts, liabilities or contracts of any husband she might have, with power in the trustee to sell and dispose of the same, in whole or in part, and reinvest the proceeds in either real or personal property, to be held for the same uses and purposes and upon the same trusts, and providing that in the event of the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

No objection was made in the Chancery Court of Shelby County to the record of the proceedings in the Supreme Court of New York upon the ground that the transcript was incomplete or not properly authenticated. If the objections were well taken, they were removable, and they should have been raised in the court below. The record was, however, in our opinion duly exemplified, Rev. Stat. § 905; Maxwell v. Stewart, 22 Wall. 77; and was in itself complete.

The judgment or decree of the New York court was entitled to the same credit and effect in the State of Tennessee that it had in the State of New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. MICHIGAN CENT. RD. CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1854

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API