Castellon v. Board of Zoning Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue of this appeal concerns the scope of our decision in Conto v. Zoning Commission, 186 Conn. 106, 439 A.2d 441 (1982). In Conto, we held that an aggrieved property owner in the town of Washington could not appeal a zoning commission’s administrative decision directly to the Superior Court, but was required instead to exhaust the applicable administrative remedies by appealing first to the Washington zoning board of appeals. Id., 114. This appeal raises the question of whether, on the one hand, that decision turned on the particular regulations of the town of Washington or,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- TLC Development, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Allied Plywood, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Conto v. Zoning Commission of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Borden v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Jewett City Savings Bank v. Town of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.