United States v. Weyhrauch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The government initiated this interlocutory appeal after the district court granted a pretrial motion excluding certain evidence from a mail fraud prosecution. Because the government has failed to establish that this interlocutory appeal has been properly certified under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we issue this third and final order for the government to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
The government indicted Defendant-Ap-pellee Bruce Weyhrauch for allegedly attempting to commit honest services mail fraud, among other charges. On September 4,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ruel Antonio WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In the Matter of the Special September 1978 Grand Jury (Ii). Appeal of John F. Wall, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WeyhrauchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Salazar Del RealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- United States v. WeyhrauchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008