Legal Opinion

United States v. Weyhrauch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2008No. 07-30339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The government initiated this interlocutory appeal after the district court granted a pretrial motion excluding certain evidence from a mail fraud prosecution. Because the government has failed to establish that this interlocutory appeal has been properly certified under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we issue this third and final order for the government to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BACKGROUND

The government indicted Defendant-Ap-pellee Bruce Weyhrauch for allegedly attempting to commit honest services mail fraud, among other charges. On September 4,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Ruel Antonio WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. In the Matter of the Special September 1978 Grand Jury (Ii). Appeal of John F. Wall, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WeyhrauchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Salazar Del RealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  3. United States v. WeyhrauchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API