Legal Opinion

United States v. Gantt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1999No. 98-50171PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

In this interlocutory appeal from a suppression order, the government argues that F.R.Cr.P. 41(d) does not require agents to serve a copy of a search warrant on a person present at the search of her property. Instead, the government contends that Rule 41(d) is satisfied if a copy of the warrant is left behind at the scene after the search is completed, even if the person is first arrested and thus has no opportunity to examine the warrant left behind. We reject the government’s interpretation of Rule 41(d) and affirm the district court’s suppression order. Before we…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Colon-MunozCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Sotomayor VazquezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
  4. United States v. Peralta-RamirezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
  5. United States v. BaldwinDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API