United States v. Ruel Antonio Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Mistakenly believing that any tinting of a vehicle’s front windows was illegal, a police officer conducted a traffic stop of the defendant’s car. The tinting toas illegal but for a different reason — because it was over twice as dark as the law allows. Although the officer misunderstood the tinting law, he was correct that the tinting he saw was illegal, and accordingly, had probable cause to stop the car. Since the stop was lawful, the results of the subsequent consent search should not have been suppressed. We reverse.
I
In April of 1999, agents of the Drug…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Richard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- United States v. Joe Davis TwilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Moreno v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Abel Aguirre MariscalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Beier v. Lewiston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.