Legal Opinion

Baines v. Harwood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1993No. CA92-08-018PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-appellants, David J. Harwood and ConHaly, Inc., appeal a $135,000 default judgment granted against them in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, Keith Baines and Thalia Baines.

On October 24,1991, appellees filed a complaint claiming appellants fraudulently induced appellees to enter an investment agreement under the terms of which appellees invested over $135,000. The complaint sought a rescission of the investment agreement, a return of all sums invested plus interest, compensatory damages in excess of $25,000, punitive damages, attorney fees, and costs. Harwood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perotti v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. AMCA International Corp. v. CarltonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Suki v. BlumeOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. National Mutual Insurance v. PapenhagenOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alliance Group, Inc. v. RosenfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Plant Equipment, Inc. v. Nationwide Control Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Miami System Corp. v. Dry Cleaning Computer Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Mueller v. HammannOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. MaxfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API