AMCA International Corp. v. Carlton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The basic issue presented is whether the trial court erred in entering a default judgment against appellant-employer under the circumstances of this case. This court holds that the trial court violated Civ. R. 55(A) in entering the default judgment and hence such judgment was improper.
The proper procedure for holding a party in default is set forth in Civ. R. 55(A) which provides in pertinent part as follows:
“Entry of judgment. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules, the party entitled to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Perotti v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- International Lottery, Inc. v. KerouacOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Alliance Group, Inc. v. RosenfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Miamisburg Motel v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Baines v. HarwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Plant Equipment, Inc. v. Nationwide Control Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.