National Mutual Insurance v. Papenhagen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The case at bar poses a single question: whether a court of appeals abuses its discretion by dismissing an appeal for the sole reason that the notice of appeal violates a local rule requiring that separate notices of appeal be filed for each case even where two or more cases were consolidated in the trial court. We hold that such a dismissal constitutes an abuse of discretion where the appealing party has demonstrated to the court that the mistake was inadvertent and made in good faith.
Loe. R. 6(A) of the Third Appellate District provides:
“Notice of Appeal. A separate notice of appeal shall…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by28 opinions
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Transamerica Insurance v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Baines v. HarwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sell v. Trumbull Cty. Juvenile Div.Ohio Court of Claims · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.