Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hyman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 2004No. 3895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

M. Richardson Hyman, Jr. appeals a circuit court order affirming the special referee’s decision that a vested remainder in certain stocks owned by Hyman’s father passed to his wife through the residuary clause of his will and not through a direct devise to his children. We affirm.

FACTS

Following a lifetime of distinguished service to the people of this state as a highly respected member of the South Carolina Bar, Melvin Hyman passed away in 1973. He was survived by his wife, Maintzie R. Hyman, and two children, Melvin R. Hyman and Mary C. Hyman. In his last will and testament, Melvin Hyman…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Matter of HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Jennings v. TalbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. NationsBank of SC v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Limehouse v. LimehouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HOLCOMBE-BURDETTE v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Sullivan v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas G. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API