Fenzel v. Floyd
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
This is a declaratory judgment action seeking to construe the Will of Miriam Marshall. All the parties are children of Mrs. Marshall. The appellants and the respondent are the beneficiaries of a devise in Item VII of the Will; the respondent is the sole beneficiary under a residuary clause in Item IX of the Will. The question presented is whether certain of Mrs. Marshall’s real property should pass under Item VII or Item IX of the Will. The circuit court held the property should pass under Item IX. We reverse and remand.
Mrs. Marshall executed her last Will and Testament on May 19,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shelley v. ShelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Jennings v. TalbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Buder v. StockeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- May v. RileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of FabianCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Bob Jones University v. StrandellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- In Re Estate of HymanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Fender v. FenderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Platt v. RomesburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.