Legal Opinion

Kaminskas v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1976No. Docket 24000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Kaminskas, a taxpayer of the City of Detroit, and plaintiff associations, unions allegedly representing city employees who are residents, taxpayers and voters in the City of Detroit, filed a complaint against the City of Detroit, the Detroit Civil Service Commission, the Mayor of Detroit, and the Detroit City Council in the Wayne County Circuit Court. The court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that plaintiffs had alleged no personal harm and hence had no standing to sue. Plaintiffs appeal this decision as of right. We affirm.

The complaint sought a declaratory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Inglis v. Public School Employees Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Baker v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Marks v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Detroit Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Trout Unlimited, Muskegon-White River Chapter v. City of White CloudMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Rayford v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Wortelboer v. Benzie CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API