Legal Opinion

Inglis v. Public School Employees Retirement Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 1, 1964No. Calendar 15, Docket 50,438PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Plaintiff, a retiree under the school employees’ retirement system, seeks mandamus to •compel defendants to follow PA 1945, No 136, as amended (CL 1948 and CLS 1961, § 38.201 et seq. [Stat Ann 1959 Rev and Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 15.893(1) et seg.]), 1 the act under which she receives her retirement allowance, in determining amounts to be appropriated to the retirement fund out of the school aid fund.

Plaintiff contends that defendant board should disregard the provisions of PA 1957, No 312, § 3a, as-added by PA 1962, No 221 (CL 1948, § 388.613a [Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 15.1919(53a)]), and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Child v. EmersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Lumley v. U of M Bd of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. University Medical Affiliates, PC v. Wayne County ExecutiveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Kaminskas v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API