Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1906No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from superior court of Grand Rapids; Newnbam, J. Bill by Eugene E. Baker against the city of Grand .Rapids to restrain the maintenance of a municipal coal yard. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

In January, 1908, the supply of coal in the city of Grand Rapids was limited, with prospects of great scarcity. Citizens could not readily obtain a necessary quantity for household purposes. Complainant and certain other coal dealers were acting in concert to control the price of- hard coal. Prices were fixed'by certain circulars which, from time to time, were sent around to these dealers. The price was advanced to $12 per ton, and those coal dealers not following the fixed prices found it difficult to obtain coal. In view of the situation, the common council of Grand Rapids, on January 5,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Laughlin v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Andrews v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API