Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1999No. 1999-1118PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 219.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HENDERSON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson,

1999-Ohio-29.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Neglecting an entrusted legal matter—Failing to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation— Failing to deliver all papers and property to which client is entitled upon withdrawal from employment. (No. 99-1118—Submitted August 25,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoylanOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. MousheyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API