Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boylan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The sanction of an indefinite suspension from the practice of law “is especially fitting * * * where neglect of a legal matter is coupled with a failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation.” Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 490, 683 N.E.2d 1148, 1149; see, also, Akron Bar Assn. v. Barnett (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 269, 685 N.E.2d 1230. The record establishes that respondent exhibited a cavalier attitude toward both the representation of his client and the ensuing disciplinary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warren County Bar Ass'n v. LieserOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. BarnettOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. HallquistOhio Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.