Legal Opinion

Borden v. Pelipchyik

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1922No. 8210. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The following concededlj correct statement of the nature and result of this suit is taken from appellant’s brief:

“Appellee, Konstanti Pelipchyk, a Russian immigrant, sued appellant, A.' P. Borden, in the district court- of Wharton county, Tex., November 14, 1914, for personal injuries sustained by appellee in a gin of appellant on October 23, 1913. The ease was submitted to the jury upon' special issues, and judgment was rendered against appellant for $7,500, from which judgment appellant has taken an appeal, with su-persedeas' bond.
“The following is a concise statement of the case:
“Appellee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HapgoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Jones v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. ArmourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Texas P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Ran v. City Nat. Bank of DecaturCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Shultz v. Dallas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Evans v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API