Legal Opinion

Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. Barger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1915No. 448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This suit was brought by appellee, Frank E. Barger, to recover damages on account of personal injuries sustained by him while in the employment of appellant, the Plouston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, in the capacity as switchman, and alleged, in substance, that at the time of the accident causing his injuries he was in the ordinary discharge of the duties of his service in or about defendant’s south yards at or near the city of Houston; that in the territory where he was engaged in said service appellant was maintaining a north-bound main line, and about westward of it a parallel…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Borden v. PelipchyikCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Harlan-Elzy-Randall Co. v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API